Pearl of Wisdom

'Keep away from doing that which you must excuse yourself for, for verily the believer neither commits a wrong nor makes excuses for himself, whereas the hypocrite commits wrongs and makes excuses for them everyday.'

Imam Hussain ibn Ali al-Shahid [as]
Tuhaf al- 'Uqul, p. 248

Latest Answers

Sexual Ethics & Morals
# 824 - looking for someone in edda mu
Salaat / Prayers
# 709 - Passing wind from the rear
Business / Investment
# 808 - Masjid or Imam Bargah
Sexual Ethics & Morals
# 807 - penetration during period
# 806 - Female masturbation
Divorce / Talaq
# 798 - Divorce
Miscellaneous
# 797 - Kiss
# 792 - hidden buried treasure
Interfaith Dialogue
# 781 - Jesus death
Fasting / Sawm / Roza
# 776 - Husbands permissn

Receive Qul Updates

Name:
Email:
Ask Qul - QA
Question : #238 Category: Hajj & Umrah
Subject: rules in Hajj
Question: Would prevention by law, of slaughtering at Mina be sufficient to realise the inability to carry out slaughtering there, especially, if there was reason to believe that a financial or physical harm could ensue, should the law be broken?
Answer: Fear of consequential harm for breaking the law should lift the obligation of slaughtering at Mina. It must not be understood, though, that slaughtering elsewhere would make up for slaughtering in it. However, what makes slaughtering elsewhere in order is [indeed] Mina’s small capacity to host all pilgrims as discussed in Manisikul Hajj.
Apparently, slaughtering was made impossible, for the reasons mentioned in the question, not for the smallness of Mina? Therefor, combining both slaughtering outside Mina and fasting in lieu of hady (sacrificial offering) should be in order, as a matter of ihtiyat luzumi.

If you require further clarification on this answer, please use the feature to respond to the stated answer.
Copyright © 2025 Qul. All Rights Reserved.
Developed by B19 Design.